Choose TEPMETKO for lasting efficacy first-line and beyond, confirmed with >18 months' follow-up*1–3
Overview of results in the VISION trial
In 111 patients with METex14 skipping NSCLC detected by tissue biopsy, first-line TEPMETKO achieved:**1
TEPMETKO vs. capmatinib
TEPMETKO may offer significantly increased mDOR vs. capmatinib2
A matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) of TEPMETKO vs. capmatinib has shown improved mDOR, mOS and mPFS2
TEPMETKO vs. capmatinib efficacy outcomes in treatment-naïve patients:
mDOR
mOS
mPFS
The same trend was observed in previously treated patients2
VISION trial: efficacy in the tissue biopsy subgroup
Tissue biopsy; ‘gold standard’ biopsy method4,5
In 111 patients with METex14 skipping NSCLC detected by tissue biopsy, first-line TEPMETKO achieved:
As in the first line, TEPMETKO achieved robust efficacy in previously treated patients which was confirmed with 18 months' follow-up:
VISION trial: efficacy in the liquid biopsy subgroup
Liquid biopsy; typically higher tumor burden5,6
Treatment-naïve patients
Previously treated patients
TEPMETKO vs. other treatments
Early use of targeted TEPMETKO therapy unlocked lasting efficacy7,8
- TEPMETKO vs. real-world outcomes
- TEPMETKO vs. standard treatment
vs.
vs.
Intracranial disease control
Even in patients with METex14 skipping NSCLC and brain metastases, TEPMETKO demonstrated robust intracranial outcomes1
Results reinforced by a substantial and meaningful subgroup of almost 60 patients††1
- 77% intracranial disease control (n=44/57)10
- 67% intracranial response (n=10/15)‡10
- 8.5 months’ (95% CI: 6.8–19.4) intracranial mPFS (n=57)10
Supported by 25% blood-brain barrier penetration in preclinical studies11








