TEPMETKO has been studied in VISION, the largest clinical trial of patients with METex14 skipping NSCLC*,**1,2

Study design

Key inclusion criteria1,2

  • Advanced/metastatic NSCLC (all histologies)
  • Positive detection of METex14 skipping by liquid and/or tissue biopsy
  • Treatment-naïve and previously treated patients

VISION: A single-arm, open-label, multicenter, non-randomized, multi-cohort study1

Cohort A

(primary)


n=152

Cohort B

(confirmatory; patients 
with >18 months’ follow-up)

n=161

Cohort A+C

N=313

TEPMETKO
450 mg QD††

TISSUE BIOPSY (n=208)

Treatment naïve (n=111)


Previously treated (n=97)

LIQUID BIOPSY (n=178)

Treatment naïve (n=95)


Previously treated (n=83)

  • Primary efficacy outcome: confirmed overall response rate by RECIST v1.1 as evaluated by IRC
  • Additional efficacy outcomes: duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival

High patient numbers: expanding cohorts have taken the METex14 skipping NSCLC population to 313 patients (Cohorts A+C)1

Robust subgroup analyses: the sizeable patient numbers in pre-defined subgroups allowed for the examination of outcomes in specific population1

Patient characteristics

The VISION study assessed TEPMETKO in 313 patients with METex14 skipping NSCLC identified by tissue or liquid biopsy1,3

Choice of biopsy to assess METex14 skipping was flexible and investigator-led – more patients were enrolled based on a positive result in tissue biopsy than in liquid biopsy (both analyzed with next-generation sequencing assays)1,3,4

Tumor burden was higher in patients who enrolled based on liquid biopsy:‡3

Median tumor load

55.2 mm for patients diagnosed via Tissue Biopsy

vs.

Median tumor load

67.1 mm for patients diagnosed via Liquid Biopsy

TEPMETKO delivered an effective response first-line and beyond1

With TEPMETKO, give your patients more moments that matter

3–4% of your patients with NSCLC may have METex14 skipping2,5,6

Explore the importance of timely targeted therapy for your NSCLC patients

TEPMETKO may offer substantially increased mDOR vs. capmatinib7

A matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) of TEPMETKO vs. capmatinib has shown improved mDOR, mOS and mPFS7

TEPMETKO demonstrated a manageable safety profile that maintained QoL**1,8–11

Most common AEs were mild to moderate9